Singapore Changi Airport experienced a tense safety moment on August 28, 2024, when a China Eastern Airlines Boeing 777-300ER crew failed to respond to a vital go-around instruction, which nearly resulted in a runway incursion with another aircraft.

The Transport Safety Investigation Bureau’s final report detailed that two China Eastern aircraft arriving from Shanghai Pudong were involved: a Boeing 777-300ER and an Airbus A320neo. The Airbus landed first on Runway 20R and was instructed to vacate via exit 7. However, traveling at a speed too high to safely use exit 6, the A320neo had to brake sharply before turning onto exit 7.

At the same time, the Boeing 777 had been cleared to land on the same runway. Observing the reducing separation, air traffic control ordered the A320neo to vacate the runway promptly and directed the 777 crew to execute a go-around when the aircraft was just 76 feet above ground level and 296 meters from the runway threshold.

The 777 crew did not acknowledge the go-around instruction and proceeded with the landing. The airport’s Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System immediately alerted the controller with visual and audio warnings. Fortunately, the A320neo had already cleared the runway edge, preventing a potential collision. Both aircraft continued taxiing safely to their terminals with no further issues.

Investigations indicated that the 777 crew likely missed the go-around call because of simultaneous altitude alerts from the aircraft’s Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS), which may have masked the controller’s transmission. Additionally, the go-around instruction immediately followed a call to the A320neo crew, possibly adding to the communication confusion.

Following the incident, Singapore’s Civil Aviation Authority reminded controllers to issue go-around commands promptly when separation concerns arise. The event has been incorporated into operational training as a case study, while China Eastern alerted its pilots to be especially vigilant in responding to low-altitude go-around instructions.

In a related event on July 20, 2025, a Singapore Airlines Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner overran the runway during landing at Tokyo Narita Airport’s Runway 16L. Flight SQ638 had landed at about 15 knots ground speed but rolled past the threshold, coming to rest in the runway end safety area designed to mitigate overrun risks. Emergency and ground crews responded quickly, towing the aircraft back to a safe location about 40 minutes later. No injuries or technical faults were found, though the return flight was delayed by approximately 3.5 hours.

Runway 16L, at 2,500 meters in length, is shorter than other primary runways at Narita, and under certain weather and operational conditions, can present challenges for wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 787-10. The incident underscores the importance of runway length, braking performance, and environmental factors in landing operations and remains under investigation.

Both incidents highlight the critical need for precise communication and strict adherence to safety protocols in busy international airports, emphasizing ongoing efforts to enhance aviation safety worldwide.

Budapest-based low-cost airline Wizz Air is pushing ahead with plans to establish a major operations hub at Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport, aiming to launch over 200 weekly flights connecting Tel Aviv to Europe and beyond. This bold move could significantly alter the country’s aviation landscape, sparking a heated debate between supporters heralding the potential benefits and local carriers fearing an existential threat.

If approved, Wizz Air would operate approximately 30 daily flights out of Ben Gurion, nearly matching the entire weekly schedule of Arkia, Israel's second-largest carrier, and making a sizable dent in the networks of Israir and El Al. The airline’s executives are scheduled to travel to Israel soon to finalize discussions that could determine the future of this ambitious project.

Transport Minister Miri Regev has thrown her weight behind Wizz Air’s plans, emphasizing how a new European low-cost carrier hub would foster competition, drive down ticket prices, and boost connectivity from the country’s main gateway. “This move represents a significant opportunity for Israeli travelers to access more affordable and diverse flights,” officials assert.

However, Israel’s homegrown carriers—El Al, Arkia, and Israir—vehemently oppose the initiative. They lobby government officials, cautioning that the entry of a foreign low-cost giant establishing a hub risks destabilizing the already vulnerable national aviation sector. Letters to various ministries warn of a “dangerous precedent” that may imperil local airlines, especially during crises when foreign operators tend to suspend flights to Israel.

Israeli carriers argue they face hefty security costs, higher airport fees, and restrictions that foreign airlines do not, placing them at a competitive disadvantage. Wizz Air’s expansion could exacerbate these disparities, potentially threatening the survival of domestic service providers.

The debate unfolds amid soaring airfares for Israeli travelers, driven by reduced seat availability following regional conflicts and the withdrawal of many international carriers. Despite temporary government-imposed fare caps on some routes, ticket prices remain high, and Israeli airlines have reported record profits — sparking calls for greater competition.

Proponents believe Wizz Air’s presence could relieve price pressures, increase flight options, and signal renewed confidence in Israel’s aviation market, possibly encouraging other foreign airlines to return.

Two main models are on the table for the hub’s structure: establishing an operational base under Wizz Air’s Hungarian license mirroring their hubs in Europe or forming an independent Israeli subsidiary with a local Air Operator’s Certificate. The latter would allow for domestic routes and long-haul flights but entails more complex regulation and higher setup costs.

The Israel Civil Aviation Authority, led by Shmuel Zakay, insists on uniform and transparent rules before sanctioning such a move. They’ve proposed compromises like relocating the hub to Ramon Airport near Eilat or requiring Wizz Air to operate under an Israeli-registered entity. Yet, Wizz Air appears committed to Terminal 1 at Ben Gurion, valuing lower costs and central location.

Supporters foresee potential annual economic benefits ranging from $800 million to $2 billion, alongside new job creation and consumer relief. Conversely, opponents warn that introducing a powerful foreign hub risks undermining Israel’s national carriers’ stability and could open the door to similar moves by other global airlines, unsettling the market further.

With national elections looming, the fate of Wizz Air’s hub hinges on Transport Minister Regev’s decision. Will she prioritize widespread affordable travel access or safeguard local airlines grappling for survival? The answer will shape the trajectory of Israeli aviation for years to come.

Tata Group-owned Air India and its low-cost subsidiary Air India Express reported a combined pre-tax loss of ₹9,568.4 crore (approximately $1.1 billion) for the financial year ending March 2025, according to provisional data shared by the Ministry of Civil Aviation.

Air India alone posted a standalone pre-tax loss of ₹3,890.2 crore, while Air India Express, historically profitable, swung to a significant loss of ₹5,678.2 crore. This marks a notable shift for the budget carrier, which had played a central role in Air India’s recovery after the Tata Group’s acquisition of both airlines in January 2022.

In contrast, IndiGo, India’s largest carrier by market share, maintained strong financial performance with a pre-tax profit of ₹7,587.5 crore (around $869 million). Newer entrant Akasa Air and struggling SpiceJet recorded losses of ₹1,983.4 crore and ₹58.1 crore, respectively.

The financial data also revealed contrasting debt levels among the major airlines. Air India held a debt of ₹26,879.6 crore at the end of FY25, while IndiGo’s debt was notably higher at ₹67,088.4 crore, reflecting its aggressive fleet and network expansion. Smaller carriers showed relatively modest debt: Air India Express at ₹617.5 crore, Akasa Air at ₹78.5 crore, and SpiceJet at ₹886 crore.

This divergence underscores different financial strategies as airlines balance expansion, operational costs, and debt management in a competitive and cost-sensitive market environment influenced by fluctuating fuel prices, currency changes, and international demand recovery.

Since the repeal of the Air Corporation Act in 1994, India’s domestic aviation market has been fully deregulated, with airlines independently managing their finances without direct government intervention. This places the responsibility for sustainable operations and financial restructuring solely on the carriers themselves. For Air India, now under Tata Group ownership, the challenge remains to execute a long-term restructuring plan while remaining competitive.

The FY25 financial performance highlights a clear divide in India’s aviation sector: IndiGo continues to strengthen its market dominance and profitability, while Tata Group’s airlines navigate the heavy burdens of transformation and integration. The losses at Air India Express, once a profitable budget arm, are particularly noteworthy amid these challenges.

Overall, the sector remains highly competitive and debt-driven, with carriers facing continued pressure from global economic factors. These provisional figures provide a revealing snapshot of the financial health of India’s top airlines as they prepare to face another challenging year ahead.

In a landmark development for air travel in New York City, Qatar Airways recently crowned World’s Best Airline 2025 by Skytrax for a record ninth time has announced it will relocate its New York operations to the brand-new Terminal One at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) in 2026. Alongside this move, the airline plans to unveil its first-ever dedicated lounge in both New York City and the United States, offering an unmatched premium experience to its travelers.

Spanning an expansive 15,000 square feet, the Qatar Airways lounge at New Terminal One promises to redefine luxury air travel. Business Class passengers can look forward to seamless access from the exclusive lounge directly to their boarding gates, creating a smooth and efficient transition through the airport. The lounge will showcase an impressive array of world-class amenities including gourmet dining options, VIP check-in, tranquil relaxation zones, prayer rooms, children’s play areas, and an exclusive duty-free shopping experience—all designed to elevate the modern traveler’s journey.

Qatar Airways’ move to the cutting-edge New Terminal One aligns perfectly with its mission to provide exceptional service. The new terminal impresses with its modern architectural design, abundant natural light, and advanced technology, ensuring that passengers enjoy a calm and seamless airport experience that complements Qatar Airways’ acclaimed onboard hospitality.

Eng. Badr Mohammed Al Meer, Group Chief Executive Officer of Qatar Airways, expressed his enthusiasm about the upcoming transition: “We look forward to opening our new state-of-the-art lounge at JFK’s New Terminal One, welcoming Business Class passengers to an enhanced airport journey in the United States. Every touchpoint from dedicated airport transfers and VIP check-in to premium shopping and dining—will deliver the world-class service that our passengers expect from the World’s Best Airline.”

This strategic move highlights New York City’s pivotal role in Qatar Airways’ global network and reinforces the airline’s dedication to providing travelers with superior service on the ground as well as in the air. As the airline prepares to settle into its new home at JFK, passengers can anticipate a next-level travel experience that truly befits a nine-time World’s Best Airline.

Air India Express (IX), the low-cost arm of Air India (AI), is steadily scaling up its operations amid a growing fleet and strengthened metro city hubs. While the airline is reinforcing its presence at key metros such as Hyderabad (HYD) and Bengaluru (BLR), its penetration into Tier-2 and Tier-3 markets remains modest by comparison.

A recent schedule analysis by aviation expert Ravreet Singh, covering the week of August 11–18, 2025, reveals Air India Express operating 42 non-metro routes across 21 city pairs using its Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 aircraft. The airline conducted roughly 302 weekly departures, offering approximately 55,000 seats. Despite this growth, IX’s footprint in smaller markets remains limited, especially when measured against low-cost carrier IndiGo (6E).

The disparity is considerable: IndiGo operated nearly four times more non-metro routes during mid-July 2025, scheduling 157 routes over 78 city-pairs, and running in excess of 1,000 weekly departures with over 212,000 seats available. Both airlines serve similar average route lengths — around 768 km for IX and 893 km for IndiGo — with comparable block times of about 1 hour 39 minutes.

Air India Express’s non-metro service frequency tends toward minimal daily flights. Only one city pair exceeded 14 weekly departures, two routes operated 8 to 13 times weekly, and the majority offered a steady but limited seven departures per week. Four routes fell below daily frequency altogether.

IX’s strategy in non-metro markets is influenced by regulatory obligations. Over half of its 21 city pairs fall under CAT-II/IIA route obligations, which are designed to maintain connectivity to smaller cities. In fact, IX often enjoys monopoly status on 11 of these routes, giving it a unique presence in certain regional markets.

Guwahati (GAU) stands out among non-metro hubs, with six routes and 54 weekly departures, followed by Pune (PNQ) with four routes and 29 weekly flights, and Bhubaneswar (BBI) offering five routes and 28 weekly services. By contrast, Air India’s full-service carrier plays a smaller role in this segment, servicing just eight routes with limited frequency and a focus on compliance rather than expansion.

Within the broader Air India Group strategy, full-service Air India consolidates its growth at Delhi (DEL) and Mumbai (BOM), emphasizing a hub-and-spoke model aimed at boosting international connectivity. Meanwhile, Air India Express positions Hyderabad and Bengaluru as important secondary hubs, particularly connecting South India with the rest of the country.

The challenge remains that Air India Group’s footprint in Tier-2 and Tier-3 markets is modest compared to IndiGo’s expansive non-metro operations. Even IndiGo faces tempered demand, with nearly 38% of its non-metro routes operating less than daily.

Looking ahead, the industry will watch whether Air India Express commits to deeper expansion into smaller domestic markets or continues to consolidate its focus on metro-centric hubs — potentially ceding the rapidly evolving non-metro segment to IndiGo’s dominance.

An unsettling privacy breach on a recent IndiGo flight departing Mumbai Airport has ignited significant public outrage, spotlighting concerns over passenger safety, dignity, and airline accountability.

Rhea Chatterji, a Mumbai-based passenger and co-founder of Safegold, shared a disturbing experience on August 8, involving a serious violation of her privacy onboard a late-night IndiGo flight from Mumbai. According to Chatterji, shortly before takeoff, while using the forward lavatory that she had locked from inside, the aircraft's First Officer unexpectedly entered, breaching her privacy in a confined space. The pilot allegedly pushed open the door after knocking twice, catching her in a vulnerable state and immediately shutting the door upon realizing the situation.

Shaken and feeling “utterly violated,” Chatterji reported the incident to the cabin crew and later to IndiGo’s senior management, including the airline’s CEO. However, she described the airline’s response as largely dismissive and inadequate. Flight attendants reportedly downplayed the severity by apologizing only for the “inconvenience” and claiming the pilot “hadn’t seen anything,” remarks Chatterji found deeply unsettling and trivializing.

The crew’s handling of the aftermath further intensified her distress. Despite her requests for space, attendants persisted in conversation and suggested she meet the pilot and captain in the cockpit—a proposition she found intimidating given the circumstances. Chatterji described enduring the remainder of the 90-minute journey in silence, overwhelmed with humiliation and isolation.

Following the flight, IndiGo offered a refund and additional vouchers as compensation, along with a formal apology. Chatterji criticized this gesture, arguing that placing a monetary value on such a violation failed to address underlying systemic issues and did little to restore her dignity. Her primary motive in going public was to raise awareness about risks passengers, especially women and families, face in situations where airline accountability falls short.

In a statement, IndiGo acknowledged the “inadvertent mistake,” confirming that the involved crew member was counselled and that enhanced training measures are being reinforced to prevent recurrence. The airline emphasized its commitment to passenger safety and dignity and claimed to treat the matter with “utmost seriousness.”

Public reaction on social media was swift and critical. Many users condemned IndiGo’s description of the incident as an “inconvenience,” arguing that it minimizes the gravity of the violation. Numerous commenters shared similar experiences and highlighted that proper lavatory occupancy indicators should make such breaches avoidable. The incident fueled broader discussions on passenger rights and the urgent need for aviation protocols to better protect vulnerable travelers and respond with empathy.

This incident has brought to light the challenge airlines face in balancing operational procedures and passenger respect. While IndiGo insists the privacy breach was accidental, the controversy underscores growing public demand for transparent, meaningful action beyond apologies and compensation—calling for renewed commitments to safeguard passenger dignity and trust industry-wide.